Submitted 1 day ago by flork@lemy.lol to selfhosted@lemmy.world
Here is my setup:
I have multiple DuckDNS domains (and subdomains) pointing to my home IP. My home router has port 80 and port 443 forwarded to Nginx Proxy Manager on my home server. Nginx Proxy Manager points to the appropriate docker container and each one is encrypted with Let’s Encrypt.
Am I missing anything here or is this how I’m supposed to be doing it? Every app that has a DuckDNS url has a password in some shape or form.
Networking looks fine, but check fail2ban as the other commenter mentioned, it goes to the npm.
Make sure to keep all internet facing applications up to date and use strong passwords.
Thanks I’m going to look into fail2ban. I mostly wanted to make sure I wasn’t being a total idiot here.
I wasn’t being a total idiot
that goes unanswered ;) it’s not unlikely selfhosters have at least one loose screw.
You’re good in that there are no immediate problems with that setup. I run a largely similar setup, have run it for years, and have never had issues.
You can always add more security layers if desired, but from my personal experience and with my risk tolerance, I haven’t personally found it necessary.
Am I missing anything here or is this how I’m supposed to be doing it?
AFA fail2ban, I always set up the jails in aggressive mode:
[sshd] mode = aggressive enabled = true port = ssh filter = sshd logpath = /var/log/auth.log maxretry = 5 <---edit to tastes bantime = 3600 <---edit to tastes findtime = 600 <---edit to tastes
You might want to check out Crowdsec, maybe deploy Tailscale as an overlay. How many users are you providing services for? If just yourself, I use the host allow / host deny feature in Linux. Just make sure you do host allow first, lol.
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
| Fewer Letters | More Letters |
|---|---|
| HTTP | Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web |
| VPN | Virtual Private Network |
| nginx | Popular HTTP server |
[Thread #71 for this comm, first seen 7th Feb 2026, 20:10] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]
Safety is relative. How are you handling every hacker in the world knocking on your door?
Personally I only expose a VPN and use that, instead of exposing a bunch of services.
Safety is relative.
It’s also not a state you can reach, it’s a mindset as well as an on-going process
I’d add Crowdsec
If any service has only username and password instead of mfa or password less then it’s not safe.
You also didn’t mention if you have automated patching or immutable backups enabled.
redlemace@lemmy.world 1 day ago
My usual additions:
flork@lemy.lol 1 day ago
Thanks I’ll look into these. Quick question: how does fail2ban use port 80 if that’s already used by nginx?
redlemace@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It does not. It does not uses ports at all. Fail2ban monitors your logfiles and activates the firewall to block IP’s that matched your rules.
t.ex. You can block an IP that tried to access https://<url>/admin. You can block an IP that used wrong credentials x times to login on an ssh port. Or block one that tried to relay via your mailserver. The duration is configurable and alternative duration can be configured for recidivists.
And yes, you can whitelist IP’s to avoid locking yourself out. The possibilities are endless.
non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What do you mean by this?
redlemace@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m using RouterOS. In the firewall rules you can create a rule that if an IP touches a port, it get added to a address list (optional with a time-out). So my FW rules begin like this:
This too has endless possibilities. t.ex. like port knocking. (‘touch’ one or more ports in a specified sequence in a specified time to be allowed to access the actual service port)