WhatsApp Will Soon Let Users Share Photos in HD

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨ugjka@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://www.thurrott.com/cloud/287273/whatsapp-hd-photos?

WhatsApp is finally letting users share pictures in better quality. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the new capability on Instagram today (via The Verge), and support for HD pictures will roll out to all WhatsApp users over the next few weeks.

As WhatsApp is used in many countries with poor connectivity, the app compresses images and videos to use less bandwidth. However, support for sending HD videos on WhatsApp is also coming soon according to Meta.

WABetaInfo previously reported that the beta version of WhatsApp for iOS and Android added support for sharing HD photos back in June. At the time, beta testers needed to manually choose the HD option every time they wanted to send a picture to other users. This is likely still the case, again, to save storage space and send photos faster.

According to The Verge, WhatsApp users on slow connections still get the choice to receive photos in either standard or HD quality. Either way, all pictures sent via WhatsApp are encrypted by default.

Last month, WhatsApp also announced that it had started rolling out video messages to all users. Video messages are currently limited to 60 seconds, and they should also become available for all users over the coming weeks.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

ChapolinColoradoNZ@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
You could always do that in Telegram…

source
giant_smeeg@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I’ve been able to do this for about 3-4 weeks now.

source
- LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Yeh I noticed I have to manually select HD. It’s still shit quality.
  
  source
Teppic@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
You can already send images as an attachment and it doesn't compress or change the file in anyway.

source
Nelsonfx@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
i already can do it, it shows a option for full resolution.

source
reallynotnick@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
“HD” pictures? So like 1megapixel (720p) or 2megapixels (1080p)? What could you do before the change 0.3MP (640x480)?

source
- AProfessional@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  The old size was around 720p but highly compressed.
  
  source
- Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Image
  
  source
yoz@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I use signal. Sworry!

source
troydowling@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
One of the frustrating things about Signal is its extreme compression. I hope WhatsApp laxing up a bit will be the final push to the Signal devs to allow me to send a 30 MiB photo if I want to. Just give me a damn opt-in option buried in a settings menu for Pete’s sake.

Annoys me to no end that I’m forced to crunch image quality down. The reasons I heard in discussion were to save disk space and network bandwidth. I have no sympathy for either of these points. Have a modicum of digital hygiene and delete old files, and pressure your ridiculous governments to invest and regulate ISPs, then join the rest of the world in the 21st century.

source
- pineapplelover@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Yeah I agree with your point. Even with Signal’s high quality image setting it is still very low quality, so much so I can visibly tell the difference, and I’m not too picky when it comes to photos. I recall you’re able to send them as files but if Signal lets you do that then I don’t see why it can’t send the raw photo like that too.
  
  source