Is there a list of important/key episodes – but not just the good episodes?

Submitted ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨UESPA_Sputnik@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨startrek@startrek.website⁩

There are many lists with recommended/must-watch episodes. But they usually just include episodes that are considered good or great.

Is there also a list with episodes that are important but not necessarily good? By important I mean episodes that introduce new concepts or new characters (or kill off important characters), or that have lasting repercussions in the overall story of the series or Star Trek as a whole, or are necessary to watch first for a pay-off way later.

For example, TNG’s “Skin of Evil” shows the death of a main character but it’s hardly a good episode. The same goes for DS9’s “Life Support”. I wouldn’t exactly call ENT’s “Storm Front” good either but it’s important to cap off the temporal cold war. TNG’s “Ménage à Troi” shows Wesley being promoted to Ensign but the rest of the episode is rather mid (except for the Picard meme) so that it wouldn’t ever appear on any must-watch list. etc.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

MurrayL@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
When I was going through TNG and DS9 for the first time with my wife, I built our watchlist based on a combination of Kethinov’s and Jammer’s reviews.

Kethinov is particularly of interest here because he gives a ‘filler rating’ for each episode, separate from its overall rating, which tells you if it’s important to the longer-term story.

source
- UESPA_Sputnik@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  I’ve also frequented Jammer’s Reviews for years because most of the time I agree with him. I also used it for the watchlist for my GF but building that list purely on good episodes gave me the idea to ask what the important episodes actually were.
  
  I didn’t know about Kethinov. Thanks for that.
  
  source
arjache@fedia.io ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
I think I’d struggle to come up with such a list in a way that it’d be a rewarding viewing experience.

Something to keep in mind is that almost all of Star Trek from before the streaming era was made with the assumption that people would tune in and not necessarily have seen any previous episodes. Especially with syndicated reruns, there was no real guarantee of even seeing the episodes in order. At most you would be expected to miss some details if you caught the second half of a two-parter, and those had recaps at the start.

Star Trek only really started to do big plot arcs with DS9 and even then it was still very episodic. The earliest they had a modern BSG-style serial plot was season 3 of Enterprise. So there’s really no need to watch “must-watch” episodes. The episodes were made with the intention that you could watch each one with minimal context and still have a good time.

source
- UESPA_Sputnik@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  I see your point. What I tried to assess is: which episodes enhance the viewing experience by rewarding the viewer for sticking around. For example, watching “Datalore” before “Brothers” is definitely not required. But it gives you some good backstory on Lore. Similarly, watching the various Maquis episodes on TNG and DS9 is not necessary to understand the Maquis characters on VOY but it’s a nice slow buildup that contextualizes a few things. Or TNG’s “The Price” and VOY’s “False Profits” – neither of them are really good episodes but it’s a “oh hey, they picked up that storyline from years ago” moment that I feel is very rewarding.
  
  And of course my all-time favorite joke when Worf hears that Keiko is having another baby and he reacts with “Now!?!?”. It only really works when you’ve seen “Disaster” before.
  
  source
  - arjache@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago
    I do love a sequel years later out of nowhere! Ship in a Bottle is also a good one for that.
    
    source