So many expensive homes

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨nostupidquestions@lemmy.world⁩

I see a lot of expensive houses being built in my area. A LOT. And the weird thing is that they’re being bought pretty quickly. Are these people just making more money than me? If so, what are they doing for a living? Or are they just living house poor? How exactly are they affording these places?

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Veraxus@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
They are not being bought by regular people like you - they are being bought by investment companies, hedge funds, and filthy rich investors... all for the the sole purpose of turning them into rentals.

By turning them into rentals, they keep supply low which increases prices... which also lets them charge exorbitant rental rates as well. They are gaming both sides of the system to ensure that us peasants can be milked dry over a fundamental human need.

source
- marcos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  That does not add up.
  
  Home rental and ownership are substitutes. If they are renting those homes, they are reducing the demand for ownership. And adding renting unities can not allow them to charge exorbitant rates.
  
  What is keeping those prices high is something else.
  
  source
  - Bookmeat@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    They are NOT reducing demand. People want to own because rental is not capital building. Demand is suppressed, but not reduced.
    
    source
  - jmanjones@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Home rental and ownership are not substitutable to each other. The amount of tax exemptions of buying a, esp as first buyer, as incredible. Find out what a buyer’s vs seller’s market is. Look at what the avg. capital gains are for homeownership vs home rental (which are basically none). You still pay property tax on rentals such as apartments. Buying real estate is an investment, meaning you make returns on it.
    
    Look, I’ll be straight up, you seem like you are coming from a place of someone who has closed on property - which is 100% okay. but you are wrong.
    
    source
- Tangent@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  In my area the biggest factor is multiple families purchasing homes together. When you’re splitting the mortgage it’s a lot more affordable.
  
  source
- Zuberi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  DRS GME. They need collateral for their bad bet
  
  source
wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
All this talk of foreign investors. But the reality is they represent a small proportion of single family homes[1]. It’s easy to blame foreigners, but the real problem is domestic. It’s corporations. Corporations are being all the housing. And they don’t mind sitting on their invest, even vacant, for years.

aljazeera.com/…/why-is-canada-banning-foreign-hom…

Foreign owners only account for a small share of the Canadian real estate market. According to Statistics Canada, a government website, non-residents owned 2.2 percent of residential properties in Ontario and 3.1 percent in British Columbia in 2020. The percentages were 2.7 and 4.2 in the Toronto and Vancouver metropolitan areas, respectively.

todayshomeowner.com/…/are-big-companies-buying-up…

According to data reported by the PEW Trust and originally gathered by CoreLogic, as of 2022, investment companies take up about a quarter of the single-family home market.

So yeah, y’all keep the bigotery going and blame foreing investors, you’re playing right into capitalism’s hand.
source
- RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  
  todayshomeowner.com/…/are-big-companies-buying-up…
  
  I feel like this article didn’t do a great job of answering the question. They didn’t really determine whether big corporations are buying homes, they determined that investors are buying homes. The actual text:
  
  According to data reported by the PEW Trust and originally gathered by CoreLogic, as of 2022, investment companies take up about a quarter of the single-family home market. Specifically,investor purchases accounted for 22% of all American homes in 2022.
  
  Those two statements are not equivalent. “Investor” could be a single individual buying a home with the intent of offering it as a vacation rental when not in use. It could be somebody who bought a duplex and rents the other unit out until their parents retire. It could be a house flipper who does 1 house at a time – each time registering an “investor purchase”.
  
  Even “corporation” doesn’t really mean anything; a “corporation” could be an LLC with one employee, the owner.
  
  And even when big corporations buy single-family homes, it’s not clear to me that this has a lasting economic impact. It sounds like a lot of these investment companies are renting the the homes or flipping them. Ultimately, demand is still demand. Somebody has to be there to buy or rent the home for these investments to make sense, so the any price increase resulting from this investment activity is some kind of external, artificial pressure. It’s a real representation of economic value, it is a price that occupants are able to pay.
  
  source
  - NielsBohron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I have a very specific viewpoint on this issue, as I live in a vacation destination. Various investors are buying up every property that comes up for sale in my community (large corporations, small companies, wealthy individuals looking for vacation homes, etc.)
    
    Every single property that gets bought, gets registered or otherwise improved to the point that there’s no chance in hell anyone living and working in the community full-time can afford to buy, unless they bought their first property before 2016. Since then, home ownership among my colleagues has become a pipe dream (and without giving away too many personal details, let me just say my colleagues and I are well-educated professionals making way above the median income for jobs in the area).
    
    As I type this out, I’m listening to a million-dollar house being built in the lot behind me (which will almost certainly sit vacant >80% of the time), a shit rental being turned over next door (which charges $3k/mo for a 3/1.5), and two short-term vacation rentals partying across the street (which usually charge $300-$400/night).
    
    Regardless of who it is, investors buying up housing is a huge problem for people that are trying to own their own home, especially first-time buyers.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Generally the problem simply boils down to there not being enough housing, it’s extremely difficult for it to remain expensive if you have more housing than you have people.

What most of the world needs right now are million programmes, just slap down a bunch of areas with commie blocks wherever you can. Sweden and other countries did this back around the 60’s and wouldn’t you know it those apartments remain vital for providing people with access to cheap housing.

source
Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
The profit margin per square foot on a large "luxury" housing unit is a lot higher than on a smaller, cheaper unit. Plus you won't get people upset that you're eroding the price of their homes by building cheaper ones, so NIMBYs won't stop you.

source
- fhqwgads@possumpat.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  As someone who works with people in residential construction fairly often, this is the answer - and it’s why they don’t build new “starter” homes anymore. It’s very difficult to turn a profit on a single family home that would be considered affordable most places.
  
  Basically, its very little extra effort and expense to build a luxury house compared to an inexpensive one, and your profit margin goes from very thin to decent.
  
  Anecdotally in my area, most residential new construction is going to retirees who have a nest egg and the sale now very expensive house, or couples who sold an inherited house. Occasionally there are people who are remotely working or people building as an investment property, but they’re in the minority.
  
  source
- marcos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  
  The profit margin per square foot on a large “luxury” housing unit is a lot higher than on a smaller, cheaper unit.
  
  This is the weird part. It’s not normal by any means, and there must be something causing it to happen.
  
  The normal situation is that cheaper homes are more profitable by area.
  
  source
  - fhqwgads@possumpat.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    From what I’ve seen this has been turned upside down by… well essentially automation, just not the kind everyone is afraid of.
    
    Between better techniques and tools, a lot of construction is significantly faster than it used to be, to the point that a job that’s smaller has enough… I guess “opportunity” cost that it can be significantly less profitable.
    
    Let’s say I’m a plumber. In the 80s, I would use copper pipe and have to solder all the connections - even a small job would take a long time - on the order of days. If I do a small house it takes way less time than a big house.
    
    But now instead I would put in long lines of PEX with crimp on connectors. It’s like 4x as fast so it should be 4x cheaper right? Except now I have to drive to 4 different jobs to work all day, set up and tear down 4 times, deal with 4 different customers and invoices, etc. OR I can do 1 big house and make essentially the same money since I cut out all the extra work.
    
    Add to that that most people are going to use more expensive finishes on larger houses that I basically just take a percentage of, and they might request something specialty and working on small affordable houses seems like a terrible business plan.
    
    source
  - Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    It’s pretty simple: The cost to make the structure of a house is pretty much the same for luxury or basic models: Framing, electrical, foundation, etc.
    
    But if you throw in some cheap granite countertops, a fancy tub, and up-market flooring suddenly it’s a luxury house and you can charge twice as much, despite it not costing nearly twice as much to build.
    
    Same thing goes for cars: A luxury car just has different fabric and some badges, but they charge way more than a comparable econobox because it’s “luxury.”
    
    source
sam@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Remote work means a lot of well paid individuals are able to move to less expensive areas, assuming internet is decent.

source
- TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  That’s me! Moved to a very small town with fast internet so I could have a house for about 0.75x my annual salary. It’s great, now we can almost afford to pay for student loans!
  
  source
Hazdaz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
This is funny, because I consider OP’s house to be obnoxiously expensive, let alone all the newer homes they mention.

There are MANY calculators out there as to how much house one can afford, and personally I think most of them over-estimate the amount. But based on very rough numbers, you could spend about 3x to 4x your yearly salary on a house. So to afford a $500k house, one “should” be in the $150k/year range. To afford a $700k house, one should be in the $200k/year salary range.

Personally I think both those numbers are bonkers and rather live well below my means than be house-poor.

The reason there are just so many expensive homes is that people are terrible at personal finances. They don’t mind being in debt and then there is the awful FOMO mentality that is helping drive home prices up for no good reason. Add in the fact that for years now new home construction has simply not kept up. There were homes being built, of course, but many of them were on the top end of the market because local town governments rather get the taxes for ten $10M homes, rather than force developers to build 50 $250k homes. So there is so much blame to pass around.

source
- SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  It’s not FOMO, it’s financial sanity. If I pay rent for another thirty years, I have nothing to show for it except a period of non-homelessness and years more of rent to come. If I pay a mortgage for the same amount for thirty years, I’m rewarded with a house for the rest of my life and no more mortgage - and I can resell the house when it no longer suits my needs, or give it to a younger family member
  
  source
- TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I think it’s awful that people are willing to be house poor in order to live in an expensive home, likely with no way to deal with it if something goes sideways.
  
  FWIW, we bought the house when it was $330k with a sizeable down payment. We wanted to make sure that only one of us can to pay for it, in case the other loses their job, or good forbid something worse happens.
  
  source
  - Hazdaz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    You sound like me! Your situation and everything is similar. I also refuse to follow the herd when it comes to 30 year loans. No way, no how am I being enslaved by debt for that long.
    
    source
ryathal@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
You need a lot more info. Are these retirement condos, older people downsizing after kids, California migrants, a popular or quickly growing neighborhood, vacation rentals, corporate speculation, or just normal cost housing for your area.

source
Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
What is the price compared to the local average salary? How long does it take someone to afford that house with two salaries?

source
BadAdvice@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
It’s the chineses. Buying real estate is kind of their thing, and since their home grown real estate ventures aren’t maturing well (check out evergrande), they’re out in other ponds buying up what they can. Down here in sunny California, we’ve got entire neighborhoods bought out by Chinese investors before ground is even broken. Then, when it’s time to actually sell, they crank up the price of everything by 60-100%. That’s how you get a shitty stucco condominium going for $2m+ in South city. It’s all a scam.

source
- brambledog@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I don’t think you can or should blame immigrants for America being a playground for the rich where the citizens are just a servicing class.
  
  source
Mothra@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Perhaps foreign investors. It’s not uncommon for rich people to buy several houses, rent them, resell them once the prices go up in a few years, repeat.

source
starlinguk@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Where I live they're all bought by investors/landlords.

source
Blamemeta@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Investors, rich immigrants, just a lot of rich people in general. Sucks, and I would blame the government.

source
Rooki@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
@TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world please make your title a question.

Its our Rule no. 1!

source
- TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Sorry! Fixed it.
  
  source