Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

A Simple Software Change to Add "Bricklayer" Mode to Slicers Delivers Truly Water-Tight 3D Prints

⁨87⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨3dprinting@lemmy.world⁩

https://www.hackster.io/news/a-simple-software-change-to-add-bricklayer-mode-to-slicers-delivers-truly-water-tight-3d-prints-1fb073499790

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Kowowow@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Would be nice to see on cura

    source
    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      You won’t ever see it in a commercial / OTS slicer implementation for a while, fucking Stratasys still has a patent on it and they love lawyers. This guy finally just said fuck it and wrote it himself.

      source
      • TootSweet@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Stratasys still has a patent on it

        That’s putting it generously, isn’t it?

        This video from a year ago goes into why the patent they have today isn’t valid. (Short answer: prior art. They patented it in 1995 and that expired in 2015 in the U.S. and 2016 in Europe. Then they re-patented it in 2020, which isn’t really something they can do, but the patent office granted it anyway, probably unaware of the prior patent. There’s kindof a “new claim” in the later patent, but there’s prior art for that as well in the form of a 2019 feature request on PrusaSlicer’s Github.)

        I get that Stratasys has lawyers and money and might theoretically be able to win even a case with as little merit as a patent case regarding that 2020 patent would have. But I’m not sure I’d go so far as to say they have a (valid) patent.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Kowowow@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Man I really don’t want to switch to something else

        source
        • -> View More Comments