I don’t see this mentioned anywhere, but what happens if thier auto approved permit requires running it through your house, or your farm field? Is it just auto immenent domained? Who, if anyone, compensates you?
GOP overhaul of broadband permit laws: Cities hate it, cable companies love it
Submitted 1 week ago by sommerset@thelemmy.club to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
Well as is the nature of these things just assume the home owner gets fucked side ways, gets nothing, and gets to cry.
zd9@lemmy.world 1 week ago
lol
PhatalFlaw@lemmy.world 1 week ago
GOP law exists, customers hate it, companies love it - there, wrote all headlines for GOP-written laws
architect@thelemmy.club 6 days ago
I own a company. I can promise it doesn’t help us.
Big business loves it. That’s it.
zd9@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Another perfect representation of small government, “don’t tread on me” governing. Totally not the slimiest hypocritical corporate-bootlicking behavior that Republicans are known for, definitely not.
Vanth@reddthat.com 1 week ago
The tl;dr
HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 1 week ago
In other words, city governments are mad that they can no longer hold up approvals in order to get more fees coughbribes from these companies.
AliasAKA@lemmy.world 1 week ago
More like, large corporations not at all invested in local communities are now empowered to completely run rough shod over local governance processes. They’re actually more likely to pay for folks to stall out slow approval processes so that they can take advantage of this law and start building, especially when the permit would have likely been denied because it didn’t consider easements, fire or flood risks, building and local regulatory standards, or any other manner of things. So this actually increases the likelihood of bribes, and ensuring that corporations actually pay less to your local government and more to personal pockets of those being bribed.
A better version of these flawed tactics would’ve been that failure to meet timelines would open the project to public vote and also that every project would require a public option (eg government supplied bid on the infrastructure) to compete. That way if timeline expires, it’s not automatically awarded to people who have a vested interest in it expiring at the expense of a community. It could be awarded to a local municipal project instead.
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
Or alternatively, companies can bribe a few local politicians to stall, then start building anyways when the deadline hits.