Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Cool Project?

⁨42⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨coffee_tacos@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨diy@slrpnk.net⁩

https://www.opensourceecology.org/

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    We have a community for this project as well: !open_source_ecology@slrpnk.net

    source
  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    There is also the Atelier Paysan in France that designed a lot of agricultural equipment published under creative Commons license.

    www.latelierpaysan.org/Outils-et-plans

    source
  • alzymologist@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I’ve been watching this project for like 10 years now probably. Keep returning there for blueprints of something relevant, but it’s either too immature or something that does not fit my setup. I think they are too unified and their scope is unrealistically broad for the group, while contributing remotely is not realistic. Their house would not work in my climate, their tractor is worse than random assembly from junk you can randomly find. Their aluminium electroliser is soft sci fi.

    But it is certainly cool project.

    I just think we need more specialised open hw projects and keep exchanging links to them.

    source
  • 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    This is an admirable project, and I one I support. However, it’s important to note that ‘’‘the issue with open source in an enterprise environment, is that there is no one to blame when things, inevitably, break or are misconfigured. The blame falls on only you, not a vendor.’‘’

    Literally the reason my former VP of IT gave me that the CEO gave him.

    source
    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Commercial support exists for opensource too so its just a misunderstanding of it.

      source
      • 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Commercial enterprise support is usually in the form of a vendor support contract, which gives the corpo someone to blame.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Because clearly blaming corporation for the ongoing climate apocalypse is going super well!

      source
      • 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I… don’t understand what you’re on about. How does the climate crisis have anything to do with my observation about FOSS enterprise support?

        The corpos aren’t looking to be blamed. They’re looking for someone to blame.

        source
    • Railcar8095@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Remove open source from any company stack and they’ll go back to using abacus.

      source
      • 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Using a proprietary solution that has FOSS components isn’t the same as a FOSS solution. Commercial enterprise support is usually in the form of a vendor support contract (or a proprietary solution that uses FOSS components), which gives the corpo someone to blame.

        Also, wasn’t the abacus, technically, open source? So, they couldn’t use that, either.

        source
    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      You’re CEO and VP of IT are idiots.

      Of course you can have open source in an enterprise environment and have someone to blame. You hire a company to install the open source software and maintain it.

      source
      • 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        **former. But yes. One of the reasons I left.

        As was pointed out earlier, commercial enterprise support for FOSS is usually in the form of a vendor support contract, which gives the corpo someone to blame.

        source
  • Five@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    @marcin_ose

    source