Organs Cannot Simply Be Classified as Male or Female

Comments

• blarghly@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Headline:

  Organs Cannot Simply Be Classified as Male or Female

  Literally the first fucking sentence:

  Only sexual organs show clear separation

  Okay, so the only ones anyone was thinking about…?

  source
• Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Well no, the only major change is the sexual organs, but glad science can back up fact

  source

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Not really, at least last time I checked, breasts aren’t sex organs, even though there is some use…

    source

    • Rolder@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Men can have breasts too it just isn’t considered generally attractive

      source
• verdi@feddit.org ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Wait you’re telling me from now on a son can donate a kidney to a mother and vice-versa? /s

  source
• witty_username@feddit.nl ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Original article:
  Xie et al. eLife 2025 “# Fast evolutionary turnover and overlapping variances of sex-biased gene expression patterns defy a simple binary sex classification of somatic tissues”
  dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99602.4

  source
• roofuskit@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Sex is not binary.

  source