Social media platforms will not be required to prove accuracy of under-16 bans

Comments

• thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I wonder how long it will be until we run out of sane countries we could VPN into, in order to avoid all of this nonsense.

  source

  • No1@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    As a matter of interest, where is the closest/fastest non fourteen eyes country that has good privacy laws?

    source

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia are your best bets currently - they’re not perfect, and who knows for how much longer…

      source
• SpaceRanger13@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  So just more security theater?

  source

  • Taleya@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    No, permission to data mine

    source
  • SpaceRanger13@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Nevermind, they have “AI” on the job. I’m sure that will keep those kids safe

    Instead, the guidelines will direct platforms to take a “layered” approach to assessing age with multiple methods, and to “minimise friction” for their users — such as by using AI-driven models that assess age with facial scans or by tracking user behaviour.

    source
• melbaboutown@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I saw this browser plugin and it looks like a far better alternative. Sorry couldn’t find a good non-X link

  linkedin.com/…/thecyberspy_onlinesafetyact-ideas-…

  source