That’s amazing.
And it doesn’t even need to stop there. Sure, DNA is a convenient starting point - we have enzymes to read and write it, plus it’s a well-studied macromolecule. But that info doesn’t need to be encoded the exact same way biological beings do (a string of phosphate and sugar with pyrimidine and purine-based molecules attached to it). We could do something weird, like
That’s just an example using silicone, mind you. I think you guys get the idea - to use the biological molecules as inspiration, but not force ourselves to do things exactly like nature does.
I know, easier said than done, but think on the benefits of this approach:
- no risk of interference in biological organisms, like @floofloof@lemmy.ca highlighted
- no risk of biological organisms interfering with it
- you can tweak information density, error, even longevity
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 months ago
Do we have data storage problems? I thought the issue is having fast access to the unbounded amount of data we can easily store.