I wonder… which kind of ‘think tanks’ are we talking about. Is it a enclosed isolated place where people can focus on their thinking undisturbed, or is it an armoured vehicle of information warfare?
Some of Australia’s most influential thinktanks refuse to reveal their biggest donors. Should they?
Submitted 3 days ago by TheDwZ@lemmy.world to australia@aussie.zone
Comments
blind3rdeye@aussie.zone 3 days ago
Tenderizer@aussie.zone 3 days ago
They’re all the people who write all the country’s news headlines basically. And that’s what they take money to do.
Taleya@aussie.zone 3 days ago
Yes. They’re fucking puppets if they’re not honest and disclosing fully
No1@aussie.zone 3 days ago
An execption to Betteridge’s law of headlines
Yes. But there will always be ways around it, eg put it few a few trusts or shell companies so that it’s not obvious who is actually donating it.
Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 3 days ago
Of course. If they don’t reveal their donors, they can’t be trusted.