From Book Bans to Internet Bans: Wyoming Lets Parents Control the Whole State’s Access to The Internet

Comments

• knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Make a .kids tld. Require certification to host on it. Let parents and schools filter to only that domain if they like.

  Leave everybody else the fuck alone.

  Tired of the stupidity that is congress, both state and federal.

  source

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Once upon a time there was .edu

    But such limitations usually have failed.

    source
  • singletona@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    It isn’t enough for htem to make a ‘child friendly’ space. Because it isn’t about being child friendly. They must impose themselves on EVERYBODY so they can look and go ‘I MADE EVERYONE CONFIRM.’

    source
  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Making TLDs for restricted content (.adu or .xxx) would be a super easy way to filter sites as well. To me it’s like putting Playboys or whatever at the top of the rack with an opaque plastic – nothing is physically stopping kids from getting to it except gross negligence from every adult in the vicinity.

    source

    • knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      No, that’s backwards. You want to whitelist, deny by default, not whack a mole a blacklist. Then you set it once and done. Hence the certification requirement to be on the whitelist.

      source
  • P1nkman@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Go to touch.kids for all your tTouchy needs!

    Direct login to your office: touch.my.kids

    source
  • cm0002@piefed.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Not a bad idea, or a mass register of all certified kid friendly domains regardless of TLD that such filtering software can freely pull from

    source
• jaybone@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  They are also opening a new giant datacenter there that will use more energy than everyone in the state five times over. Red states lol.

  source
• BetaBlake@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Pussies

  source