I swear people just want to be unhappy.
We say we don’t want companies to illegally hire, yet when they do and face the consequences of it, we get stories like this.
We can’t have low fines, otherwise business just treat it as a cost of doing business… I’m sure we’ve all seen stories of big companies knowingly breaking the law and being fined pennies, and things like small companies fly tipping because occasionally being caught works out cheaper than proper waste management.
The onus is on the hiring company to check if the person has all the required paperwork and has a legal right to work.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Shouldn’t they fine the illegal in that case? It sounds like the business took appropriate measures.
Granted, you can check if a passport is authentic using your phone (as passports have RFID chips which contain digitally signed data that your phone can read) but I wouldn’t expect an old bloke to know how to do that
echodot@feddit.uk 8 months ago
That’s why businesses insist on seeing your actual passport. Not a picture of it.
I can give you a picture of anything, that’s been true for years even before the rise of image generation AI. I once had to mail my passport via recorded courier to a company in London in order to apply for a job in Leeds. Hell of a pain but necessary.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 months ago
I had a job and they only wanted a picture scan of it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
frazorth@feddit.uk 8 months ago
There is the point where if the person had valid identification, and National Insurance, and was paid via HMRC, that the onus should be on notifying the business of a change of status. Whether that’s the student or HMRC I don’t know. They would notify the business on a change of required tax.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Yeah, I feel HMRC should have done something other than wait two years before going “actually no, pay us a fine”.