Windows 12 release is pushed back at least another year as Microsoft announces Windows 11 version 25H2

Comments

• lemmyman210@sh.itjust.works ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  They can’t even get 11 to work, why not start talking about 12!!

  source

  • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I’m losing track, but don’t they usually go good, bad, good, bad?

    98 good, m.e. bad, xp good, vista bad, 7 good, 8 bad, 10 good, 11 bad, so maybe 12 good?

    Obviously I’m over simplifying and I skipped over 2000. But at least since 98 I feel like the trend has been pretty reliable.

    source

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      2000 was marketed as business and server only, like NT before it.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • scott@lemmy.org ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I mean sort of except 10 was bad too. They’re just all bad since 7

      source
    • supernicepojo@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Only if you ignore the NT and server releases. Otherwise, sure why not.

      source
  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    What about windows 11 doesn’t work?

    source

    • Geologist@lemmy.zip ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      For me, the ability to move your taskbar to the sides of the screen. I use an ultrawide, and have plenty of horizontal space to spare, but very little vertical.

      It’s a ridiculous regression, that only exists because MS engineers are too lazy to figure out how to put all their new taskbar junk like copilot, weather, news, etc. in a vertical setting.

      source