California’s solar energy boom is often hailed as a green success story but a new study reveals a murkier reality beneath the sunlit panels. Researchers uncover seven distinct forms of corruption threatening the integrity of the state s clean energy expansion, including favoritism, land grabs, and misleading environmental claims. Perhaps most eyebrow-raising are allegations of romantic entanglements between senior officials and solar lobbyists, blurring the lines between personal influence and public interest. The report paints a picture of a solar sector racing ahead while governance and ethical safeguards fall dangerously behind.
They point to a blend of public, private, social, and political patterns of corruption in the California solar energy market.
1. Clientelism and favoritism: Hiring friends or family over others for solar projects and unfairly allocating government contracts or permits to project developers, which in one instance led to an investigative report questioning the influence of a sexual relationship.
2. Rent-seeking and land grabbing: Redirecting public funds or lands to benefit private developers and taking communal or public land from Indigenous peoples or other groups for energy infrastructure siting.
3. Service diversion: Withholding local benefits, such as lower electricity bills, or distributing locally generated power only to higher-paying parts of the state.
4. Theft: Forceful removal of flora or cultural artifacts, or disturbing animal habitat, to build solar project sites.
5. Greenwashing: Misleading the public about a solar project’s environmental benefits; using flawed environmental or cultural impact assessments to evaluate project impacts, such as pollution of nearby waterways; and overriding environmental protections to fast-track solar infrastructure expansion.
6. Tax evasion and avoidance: Not paying or underpaying taxes, or governmental authorities strategically failing to adequately allocate project funds to communities impacted by solar project development.
7. Non-transparency: Hiding, manipulating, or failing to disclose relevant or important information surrounding solar projects, such as the local economic benefits and environmental impacts.
SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
Is it more prevalent in the renewables than in the oil and gas?
If not, maybe we should focus on the first in class before trying to cast the doubt on the best in class… Especially in the current state of the USA.
DMCMNFIBFFF@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
You raise a good point, though.
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
Agreed that oil and gas are far worse in these aspects.
Let’s not succumb to whataboutism, however. These are still important issues to consider to keep green energy sources ethical and to prevent corporate corruption and greenwashing of these alternative energy sources. This should be worth considering for those interested in green energ , especially for solarpunks practicing prefigurative politics. to prevent these issues in the future.
SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
It’s not whataboutism. It’s getting the priorities straight and not getting distracted by false problems.
What is raised in the article is not specific to renewables. It’s pretty much generalized as soon as you have private interests.
So isolating renewables is improper and demagogic.