Dark Patterns is a broad term, but it’s also the worst aspect of commercialising “free” software/web services etc.
I hope the term is already part of whatever regulations the EU has there, and I hope this and similar complaints succeed.
Consumer groups file complaint against SHEIN for dark patterns fuelling over-consumption
Submitted 3 weeks ago by Pro@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m hopeful too. We need things like this to start moving in the opposite direction.
The internet and surveillance capitalism have allowed for hyper optimized psychological manipulation. It’s long past time for regulations to catch up.
cotlovan@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
How is that different than any other global online market place? Even Amazon tries to put additional things in my shopping cart without me ever asking for it
andallthat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’ve never used SHEIN so I can’t tell if they are using these practices or how bad they are, but from the article I see they allegedly use fake urgency messaging, which I know has been sanctioned before in the EU (the company I used to work with had to rush removing it from our eCommerce site). A company can tell you that the item you’re looking at happens to be the last one in stock, if it’s true. But if they lie about it, so you rush into a decision to buy it before it’s gone, then it’s a deceptive practice.
markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Everyone does that all the time though. I can’t remember the last time I bought something online that wasn’t supposedly either the last one in stock or one of like 5 left. It’s obviously bullshit and everyone is doing it.
Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Trump could solve this but he’s a coward. I got downvoted last time I said this but I’ll repeat it, the tariffs were a good thing as they would absolutely destroy this consumerist culture we live in. The degrowth is a feature not a bug.
But Trump doesnt have the balls to do it so 🤷🏽♂️
MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The problem with these tariffs, implemented in this way, is that the less wealthy has to shoulder the shock and most of the loss of wealth, while the most wealthy solidify their place in society on several levels. The social balance of power further shifts toward the billionaires.
Tarriffs are better applied for protecting existing small and mid-size businesses in danger of being wiped out by huge foreign operations, and protecting industries that have national security roles.
The key here is they would be applied before we lose the capacity - not decades after we already adjusted to the loss.
On this side of the curve it is more productive to subsidize operations that can (re)build the capacity we seek. Biden’s work with TSMC was a prime example. This approach is less disruptive. Even then, targeted tarriffs can be productive.
We could have saved our solar industry. We decided to let China sell priduct at a loss until their competition went out of business or left because no profit could be achieved. This is where tariffs make sense.
why0y@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
I don’t think you’re wrong de facto, and the intentions of the tariffs are certainly different from the results.
Not a Trump supporter btw, just skeptical of each and every neocon/neolib that sets foot near business regulations and PAC money.
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I guess I’m just old school and pretty impervious to buying shit I don’t need.
krashmo@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
No you’re not. Advertising, propaganda, and overconsumption impacts everyone.
isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Image
gian@lemmy.grys.it 3 weeks ago
Yet some people are able to not buy shit just because they see it on a site, so maybe not everyone is like you say