Programmer paradigm shift... Have YOU made the shift??? 🫵

Comments

• RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  TBH I can wait for these fucks to find out that their kindergarden approach to programming won’t work. I’ll charge a premium to fix their shit later.

  source
• Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I’ve forgotten more about CS fundamentals than you’ve ever whippersnappered

  source
• insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  You use AI to code for you.

  I alone use the wrong type of hammer to slowly and frustratedly get very basic tasks accomplished once every season if I’m lucky…

  we are not the same.

  source
• slaacaa@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  If only there was a programming language that feels so good it negates the need for vibe coding…

  source

  • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I feel it’s more true for Nim-lang. No dealing with pointers (it’s possible, just not a normal thing like int**, Nim has newer memory management options like arc/orc). There’s also stuff like for i in 0…9 (and ranges like that have more options/uses too)

    I mean I guess there is overlap (both languages have UFCS and interop). So it might come down to syntax or specific implementation. Though I imagine if you like the braces style, there are other options to look at like Zig (or Rust, there is complexity but also popularity).

    I know there is some difficulty when it comes to a language being niche (at least when lacking knowledge), and that’s certainly true for me with Nim.

    * the asterisk is instead used for public+importable

    source