Tantrum & sulk seem to be a loop.

Comments

• K4mpfie@feddit.org ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Idk seems like the whole “write the damn paper and rework it until you’re good” part is missing (It’s just yet another loop of tantrum and sulk)

  source
• mvirts@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Bruh you still gotta publish that unsupported hypothesis

  source

  • match@pawb.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Is there a particular journal for this

    source

    • mvirts@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Hmmmmm if we can sell it to AI companies…

      source
  • taiyang@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Nah, academics love their publication biases.

    Wait, I mean journal publishers. Publishers love their publication biases.

    source
• Midnitte@beehaw.org ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Lose interest doesn’t seem to have enough connecting arrows

  source

  • SaltSong@startrek.website ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Other than that, it seems fairly accurate.

    source

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      there are several problems with this flow chart… question life choices, sulk… i’m wondering if this was ai generated

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Datorie@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Where’s the inevitable desk reject after months of work?

  source