[deleted]

Comments

• MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Why do I feel like this article is a paid advertisement for Anthropic?

  source
• just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  And yet, it’s still dumb as hell at coding and can’t kick out a simple script that works.

  Funny, that…

  source

  • sunilkumardash9@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You need to try it to see.

    source

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I try every new release. Still bad.

      source
• sunilkumardash9@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  TL;DR

  • Claude Opus 4 leads in raw performance and prompt adherence.
  • It understands user intentions better, reminiscent of 3.6 Sonnet.
  • High taste. The generated outputs are tasteful. Retains the Opus 3 personality to an extent.
  • Though unrelated to code, the model feels nice, and I never enjoyed talking to Gemini and o3.
  • Gemini 2.5 is more affordable in pricing and takes fewer API credits than Opus.
  • One million context length is undefeatable for large codebase understanding.
  • Opus is the slowest in time to first token. You have to be patient with the thinking mode.

  source