sunilkumardash9
@sunilkumardash9@lemmy.world
This is a remote user, information on this page may be incomplete. View at Source ↗
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
You need to try it to see.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
TL;DR
- Claude Opus 4 leads in raw performance and prompt adherence.
- It understands user intentions better, reminiscent of 3.6 Sonnet.
- High taste. The generated outputs are tasteful. Retains the Opus 3 personality to an extent.
- Though unrelated to code, the model feels nice, and I never enjoyed talking to Gemini and o3.
- Gemini 2.5 is more affordable in pricing and takes fewer API credits than Opus.
- One million context length is undefeatable for large codebase understanding.
- Opus is the slowest in time to first token. You have to be patient with the thinking mode.
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to technology@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Submitted 1 month ago to technology@lemmy.world | 1 comment
- Submitted 1 month ago to technology@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Submitted 1 month ago to technology@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 3 comments
- Comment on Notes on Gemini 2.5 Pro: A new coding SOTA 2 months ago:
Which model has done a C++ refactoring of a real-application?
- Submitted 2 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 4 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 5 comments