sunilkumardash9

@sunilkumardash9@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  You need to try it to see.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  TL;DR

  • Claude Opus 4 leads in raw performance and prompt adherence.
  • It understands user intentions better, reminiscent of 3.6 Sonnet.
  • High taste. The generated outputs are tasteful. Retains the Opus 3 personality to an extent.
  • Though unrelated to code, the model feels nice, and I never enjoyed talking to Gemini and o3.
  • Gemini 2.5 is more affordable in pricing and takes fewer API credits than Opus.
  • One million context length is undefeatable for large codebase understanding.
  • Opus is the slowest in time to first token. You have to be patient with the thinking mode.
• Notes on AlphaEvolvecomposio.dev ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩ | ⁨0⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• OpenAI o3 vs. Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. o4-minicomposio.dev ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩ | ⁨1⁩ ⁨comment⁩
• What is Model Context Protocol (MCP): Explainedcomposio.dev ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩ | ⁨0⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• Notes on Llama 4: The Hits, the Misses, and the Disasterscomposio.dev ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩ | ⁨0⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Coding Comparisoncomposio.dev ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩ | ⁨3⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Notes on Gemini 2.5 Pro: A new coding SOTA⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Which model has done a C++ refactoring of a real-application?

• Notes on Gemini 2.5 Pro: A new coding SOTAcomposio.dev ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩ | ⁨4⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• Deepseek v3 0324: Finally, the Sonnet 3.5 at Homecomposio.dev ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩ | ⁨5⁩ ⁨comments⁩