Not according to my Reddit user score and perhaps Lenny’s if there is one. Have not looked yet. So not all. I really just like the add to the discussion and help others where I can.
Are We All Becoming More Hostile Online?
Submitted 2 days ago by KarlHeinzSchwuke@feddit.org to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Flemmy@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Meet Anon.
MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Nope. Its the same as it ever way.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Theres so much pedophilia, wanton violence, racism, misogyny, honophobia… fuck all these people. May they never find peace or happiness. We owe no one politeness.
kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
The special group of people providing negativity are probably bots anyway.
xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yes. It is longer than just now though.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Try pitchhforks
MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Some people deliberately come to social media for fighting. I probably used to. Maybe on occasion when I’m feeling cranky I will be less diplomatic than I really want to be.
But I find two things actually help:
Bluesky has a feature to mute keywords for a set period. If I need a break from news about Gaza, Trump, some trending drama, sports (like the World Cup), or just want to avoid spoilers, I mute the topic for a while.
Together, these tools make social media much less negative for me. It usually keeps me from doom scrolling or taking the rage bait.
And when I’m emotionally charged or unclear, I sometimes draft my comments elsewhere before posting. I let it sit for a bit, and if I can’t say what I mean with the tone and clarity I want, I just don’t post. Maybe 30% of my comments get binned—some after spending an hour or more working on them.
In short, I heavily curate my social interactions—both incoming and outgoing—to reduce stress and negativity. As a result, social media today is far more pleasant than it was ten years ago.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 days ago
BlueSky is genuinely one of the least toxic socials I’ve had in a while. I can agree to disagree there on normal issues like whether UBI should be given in a lump sum, weekly, monthly- it’s not fucking assholes “debating” if aliens built the pyramids and whether we should drink our own pee or if good faith arguments are important or if it’s “natural” to be attracted to 14yr old girls as an adult man (all topics I’ve seen on Lemmy).
MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
That’s one of those things where I’m happiest just not seeing or being part of that conversation. Those are unserious people and it’s pointless to pretend you can have a serious conversation about those things. And even if you could, what is the value to me to wade into the nuance of when it’s okay to find someone attractive when frankly it wouldn’t matter—if they didn’t act like aggressive horny assholes to anyone. I have 13 and 15 year old daughters. I don’t really care who finds them attractive, but I do care who disrespects them, and that’s not going to change when they turn 18, so again that conversation doesn’t need my presence at all.
I’ll agree that Bluesky is minimally toxic, but I also haven’t gotten a whiff of those kinds of conversations here on Lemmy, either. The most contentious ones were in the run-up to the elections and that’s just a tense time for everyone. And it’s hard to let opinions we vehemently disagree with run rampant when the consequences for getting shit wrong are… well… gestures at everything.
GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Wait, what?