Will the things use LIDAR? Tesla is so far behind on self-driving tech in their cars, I think they need to finally admit their cheap camera-only method doesn’t work.
Tesla ‘Robotaxi’ trademark refused for being too generic
Submitted 6 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.zip
https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/07/tesla-robotaxi-trademark-refused-for-being-too-generic/
Comments
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 days ago
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 days ago
Obviously you don’t understand that lidar is a waste of time and camera only if exactly what a car needs.
Musk, probably
nolefan33@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
If cars needed lidar, why did God make them without it?
XaetaCore@lemmy.xaetacore.net 5 days ago
“I probably know more than anyone alive about manufacturing” Literally same year “ThE CyBeR RoAdStEr WiLl Be DeLiVeReD nExT yEaR” said every year it got delayed for the last 10 years
kooks_only@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
Sorry, couldn’t read this. My eyes were just blinded by Tesla headlights.
CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 5 days ago
dr_robotBones@reddthat.com 5 days ago
Wish they would’ve done that for Figma’s ridiculous Dev Mode^tm^
XaetaCore@lemmy.xaetacore.net 5 days ago
Cybercar Cybercab Robotaxi X Space X
Do i need to go on, its like a 12 year old coming up with names. Good thing that they refuse these trademarks because it gives me vietnam flashbacks from the REACT youtube channel
Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 days ago
it looks like a repurposed cybertruck.
harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
Trademark office about to get DOGEd.
I’m surprised Musk didn’t name it “RoboTaXXXi” or something like that.
resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 5 days ago
RoboTakkkksi.
someguy3@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Robo69taxi420.
1337robotaxi.
Roboslavewantsyouinsideher.
Mac@mander.xyz 5 days ago
He’ll come back with XxRoboTaxi42069xX most assuredly.