Every couple of years a shiny new AI development emerges and people in tech go “This is it! The next computing paradigm is here! We’ll only use natural language going forward!”. But then nothing actually changes and we continue using computers the way we always have, until the debate resurfaces a few years later.
Reminds me a bit of graphical programming. Every couple of years someone comes up with the idea of replacing textual programming with some kind of graphical interface with arrows between nested boxed of various shapes and it inevitably fails.
aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The obsession with conversational interfaces likely stems from two places: sci-fi and CEOs who are used to ordering people around.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 days ago
“Do this, do that, and read between the lines!”
taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Maybe the tendency for LLMs to shower the user with praise for their prompts also makes them attractive to egocentric CEO type of personalities?
aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 days ago
When I used those things, I absolutely understood why a CEO would want those to be the future. It’s everything they’re looking for: a strident, confident yes man machine who will produce without consternation any kind of spin (unethical or not) to any kind of content requested.