Could you elaborate? I don’t understand what you mean.
I could do more with native reverse image searches then I currently do with LLM AI.
Submitted 1 day ago by Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to showerthoughts@lemmy.world
Comments
Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Basically, everything search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search.
Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Edit: damn, that down vote hurt. Must be an llm developer, I guess.
If you are accusing me, as of writing this, I have not downvoted your comment ^[1]^.
References
1. Type: Post. Title: “I could do more with native reverse image searches then I currently do with LLM AI.”. Author: @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world. Publisher: sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2025-02-28T04:46:11Z. Accessed: 2025-02-28T06:14Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/33553357/16973103. - Image - The score of @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world’s comment shows it to have 2 downvotes (confirming that it has indeed been downvoted by someone), yet the downvote icon is not highlighted. Given that this comment is posted from @Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works’s account (@Kalcifer is shown to be logged in in the top right), It would be highlighted if @Kalcifer had downvoted it.
Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Basically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search. […]
So, for clarity, are you saying that a reverse image search tool is more useful to you than AI integration, yet search engines are pushing for AI integration rather than reverse image search tools, and they may not have reverse image search tools at all?
Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What search engine do you use that has LLM integration but doesn’t already have reverse image search?
Snickeboa@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You are comparing apples and oranges. That’s probably why.
DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 17 hours ago
Image
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
They’re ok, just pretty limited in what they can do. Doesn’t help i also have to fact check them.
realitista@lemm.ee 15 hours ago
My use cases thus far have been pretty minimal. Stuff like OCR extraction of tables from images (which were possible before LLM’s), some of the built in summarization features which provide tiny value. I’ve never actually used them to write something for me. The one time I considered it I found something better already written.