I could do more with native reverse image searches then I currently do with LLM AI.

Comments

• DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Image

  source

  • possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Useful if you understand how they work and what they are good at

    source
  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    They’re ok, just pretty limited in what they can do. Doesn’t help i also have to fact check them.

    source
  • realitista@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    My use cases thus far have been pretty minimal. Stuff like OCR extraction of tables from images (which were possible before LLM’s), some of the built in summarization features which provide tiny value. I’ve never actually used them to write something for me. The one time I considered it I found something better already written.

    source
• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Could you elaborate? I don’t understand what you mean.

  source

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Basically, everything search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search.

    source

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Edit: damn, that down vote hurt. Must be an llm developer, I guess.

      If you are accusing me, as of writing this, I have not downvoted your comment ^[1]^.

      References

      1. Type: Post. Title: “I could do more with native reverse image searches then I currently do with LLM AI.”. Author: @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world. Publisher: sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2025-02-28T04:46:11Z. Accessed: 2025-02-28T06:14Z. URI: sh.itjust.works/post/33553357/16973103. - Image - The score of @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world’s comment shows it to have 2 downvotes (confirming that it has indeed been downvoted by someone), yet the downvote icon is not highlighted. Given that this comment is posted from @Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works’s account (@Kalcifer is shown to be logged in in the top right), It would be highlighted if @Kalcifer had downvoted it.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Basically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search. […]

      So, for clarity, are you saying that a reverse image search tool is more useful to you than AI integration, yet search engines are pushing for AI integration rather than reverse image search tools, and they may not have reverse image search tools at all?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Voyajer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      What search engine do you use that has LLM integration but doesn’t already have reverse image search?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Snickeboa@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You are comparing apples and oranges. That’s probably why.

      source
• Irelephant@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Bings image search is still its most useful feature.

  source
• sissi@leminal.space ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  But at least you can use LLM AI for the simple price of checks notes environmental catastrophe

  source