Interest in a website containing the docker-compose files of projects listed in the awesome-selfhosted list

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨mrmn@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨selfhosted@lemmy.world⁩

Hi c/selfhosted,

I have another project idea. However, before I start I want to make sure there is interest in the community and a similar project does not exist yet.

I was thinking about a “compose” website that contains the compose files and basic information of the projects listed in the awesome-selfhosted list. Users can search for projects, browse by categories, etc. In my opinion when finding a new project you want to try out it, is a bit cumbersome to find the corresponding compose file to get started.

Let me know if there is any interest in such a project. Also I have no idea how I would name the project, so give me your best suggestions :). Thanks!

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

PunkiBas@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Have you looked at this?:

haxxnet.github.io/Compose-Examples/

source
- EasternLettuce@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  [deleted]
  source
  - ikidd@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Non-Fungible Tokens?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Obelix@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
You might want to take a look at community-scripts.github.io/ProxmoxVE/ . That’s exactly what you want, but without Docker. It uses Proxmox / LXC / VMs and is really, really awesome for selfhosting.

source
- SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  RIP ttek
  
  source
  - Obelix@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    I’m really happy that the community stepped up and continued his great work.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
node815@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
I’m not the host or author of this one, but I know it already covers what you are wanting to do. ;)

awesome-docker-compose.com/apps

source
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
I’d assume the projects either have a docker-compose example in the readme or in the repository files alongside the actual project.
Is that so uncommon?

source
- fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  It’s not that it’s uncommon, but slightly different for each project.
  
  I collated library would be kinda cool.
  
  That said, I don’t know how much utility this project would have.
  
  source
  - AbidanYre@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    It might be cool, but it seems like it would be missing the context and documentation that would be present in it’s project repo.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Yeah, that’s fair. Very convoluted and difficult documented.
    
    source
Tiritibambix@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
I know of these:

github.com/bitnami/containers/tree/main/bitnami/

github.com/docker/awesome-compose

They’re not specific to projects listed in the awesome-selfhosted list though.

source
Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
While most have examples in their readme’s on Docker hub and Github, not all of them do, so I sometimes have to hunt down an example buried in their git repo somewhere. So a searchable page for popular self-hosted app docker compose files would be welcome.

I don’t think I’ve seen such a page anywhere else.

source
BlindFrog@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
I run synology, so I usually refer to this guy’s website first to compare projects mariushosting.com/docker/

Although, some guides he posts require an environment variables file, of which he requires a donation for before downloading. I just scour the internet for the original projects’ compose at that point.

source
x00z@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Why compose and not just containers?

source
- 4am@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Why would anyone use containers without compose?
  
  Especially people who are newer? It’s far easier.
  
  source
  - x00z@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    You answer my question with a question… But I’ll answer it.
    
    Compose is meant for multi-container applications or development. It’s good for custom applications where you need to manage every service yourself so you mostly see them used for stuff like web stacks.
    
    Single container applications are much easier to run and manage for the end-user and most of the awesome-selfhosted apps are already served as single container images on the docker hub. There is absolutely no need to use compose for any of those because you are not managing every service of the app yourself.
    
    I have a big server with lots of containers running for apps. For example, I have a container for my blog, one for FreshRSS, and even one for Teamspeak. But I only use Compose for one application and that’s my own custom one. That one consists of an nginx container, php container, etc. I don’t need to dive into the different services of FreshRSS for example, but I do need to for my own custom app.
    
    source
  - tripflag@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    for a selfhosted service which is a single self-contained process in a single container, is there still a benefit to using compose, and if so, what would that be? genuine question since I’m not providing a compose example for a foss service I made.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - JollyGreen_sasquatch@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Compose doesn’t have a versioned standard, it did for a bit iirc, which also means you can’t always just grab a compose file and know it will always just work.
    
    Most self hosted works fine with giant all in one containers, even for complex apps, it’s when you need to scale you usually hit problems with an all in one container approach and have to change.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments