Palo Alto Networks confirms mystery zero day now exploited

Comments

• thejml@lemm.ee ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  with the US-based security vendor on November 11 urging customers to pull their management interfaces off the public internet or restrict them to known IP addresses.

  Why would you EVER put management interfaces on the public internet? What terrible decisions led them down that path? VPN is so quick and easy at a minimum.

  source

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The network gear I manage is only accessible via VPN, or from a trusted internal network…

    …and by “my network” I mean my home network (a router and a few managed switches and access points). If a doofus like me can set it up for my home, I’d think that actual companies would be able to figure it out, too.

    source
  • catloaf@lemm.ee ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Management interfaces shouldn’t even be accessible from the general LAN.

    source
  • Evotech@lemmy.world ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I know right, 99% of these caves are against management interfaces too

    source
  • jdeath@lemm.ee ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    zero trust?

    source
• lnxtx@feddit.nl ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  www.paloaltonetworks.com → Leader in Cybersecurity Protection & Software for the Modern Enterprises - Palo Alto Networks

  Thanks, I will avoid them.

  source

  • VonReposti@feddit.dk ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    They’re spamming all web logs too with an advertisement for their services in the user agent. I decided to ban them from all my websites because the logs took up too much space.

    source

    • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      lmao that’s not an ad, dude.

      source

      • -> View More Comments