Basically title, curious as I know this had been brought up a while ago but never really followed up on the topic
i would guess for the lemmy.zip people, if something annoying happens, we would consider to switch instances. But i haven’t heared something. Even if my workplace blocks lemmy.zip, would matter much for me. But it’s not even the case.
BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev 3 months ago
I know my job banned .zip domains as soon as they leared of it. It’s an IT firm so they don’t really care to take any chances, and would rather just make exceptions if needed.
0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
I don’t get what’s more concerning about the .zip TLD than any other one.
BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev 3 months ago
They are just more likely to be scam like, particularly since they can be assumed to be a file at a glance.
Even more deviously, crafty urls like this further hides what you are actually doing, like this:
github.com∕kubernetes∕kubernetes∕archive∕refs∕tag…
Hover it with your cursor, watch what that actually links too, no markup cheating involved. Anything before the @ is just user information. Imagine clicking that and thinking you downlodaed a tagged build, only to get a malware?
It’s not the end of the world, but as a developer it makes great sense to just auto-block it to avoid an incident. The above URL is from this article, which says it’s not as big of huge problem too:
www.theregister.com/…/google_zip_mov_domains/
But it’s kind of a death by a thousand cuts to me, because it’s another thing with another set of consideration accross the internet ecosystem that one will have to deal with.
perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Software that creates hyperlinks whenever it finds text that might be a URL, combined with ubiquitous use of .zip extension for compressed files.
ceiphas@lemmy.world 3 months ago
ZIP Files are a constant source of exploits and Malware.