Or they just found out that Windows process scheduler is still broken beyond repair. If you look at the benchmarks on GNU/Linux performance is all there. For example see Phoronix benchmark
We found the Missing Performance: Zen 5 Tested with SMT Disabled
Submitted 2 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-9700x-performance-smt-disabled/
Comments
JRepin@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
drbluefall@toast.ooo 2 months ago
I know the article says what it is, I know it’s wrong, I know it’s irrelevant…
But I can’t read “SMT” as anything other as Shin Megami Tensei.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
🤦♀️
adarza@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
so, basically, the os isn’t tuned for the new chips yet.
the 2nd threads on smt-enabled cores are supposed to get hit last.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
It’s an easy fix, sure.
But there are 3 manufacturers for them to schedule for. It should be ready way before anything ships.
SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 2 months ago
There should be no need for tuning, tweaking, or optimizing on functionality this basic.
If you ask the processor, it will spit out a graph like this telling you what threads/cores share resources, all the way up to (on large or server platforms) some RAM or PCIe slots being closer to certain groups of cores.
barsoap@lemm.ee 2 months ago
For values of “new chips” that include 20 year old ones. Foster was released 2001, the chips were single-core but you could have up to eight on a board so it’s still multi-core SMT. First on-die multi-core SMT seemed to have been Paxville, 2005.