Powerful

Comments

• rockSlayer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Based

  source

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Now that I’m looking for it, I can’t find it anywhere, I think it might just be something unpublished from the person on mastodon. Would make sense with them saying they love footnotes

    source

    • 01101000_01101001@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Would be super easy to make a LaTeX document on Overleaf just for the Internet points

      source
• damnedfurry@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Is the point meant to be that women don’t build off of their previous work as much as men? lol

  Powerful This “science meme” needs more science and less meme, imo, lol

  source

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Not necessarily. Self citation is different than building on your previous work. You might just seek to use other citations for the relevent concepts

    source

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Yeah, I feel like a good middle ground is to cite your previous work in the context of “as we previously reported,” but maybe that’s just based on something that was ingrained in me by academia. It seems tacky. My boss has no problem with it though, he’s like, “idgaf, more citations, more views, higher impact.”

      source
  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Also we chase women out of academia by early mid-career, so they have less opportunity for self citation.

    source

    • damnedfurry@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Uh, women graduate college at a rate much higher than men in the US, this is total bullshit, lol.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Mango@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  K

  source