Let's goooooooo

Comments

• sukhmel@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m not quite sure what is being conveyed here, but these “nothingness = -0” and “universe = ∞” give me strong pseudoscience vibes 😅 maybe the dynamic equilibrium is supported by an ether wind or something

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    …wikipedia.org/…/Future_of_an_expanding_universe

    source

    • sukhmel@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Thanks, although both timescales and events in that article make me depressed 😅

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  And this does not take into account quantum foam.

  source

  • sundray@lemmus.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Or those quantum foam parties in South Beach.

    source

    • Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      If you get quantum foam you must be pouring it too fast.

      source
• knorke3@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  But can we actually prove that Universe and Nothingness are not actually the same group?

  (Context: P vs. NP)

  source
• Sanctus@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  We end where we begin, in nothingness

  source
• Heavybell@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This looks like nonsense, but what do I know? In any case I prefer not to think about it. :P

  source
• Vampire@hexbear.net ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Explain this

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    …wikipedia.org/…/Future_of_an_expanding_universe

    source