Comment on Existing California solar customers may get blindsided with net metering cuts

• tal@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Could easily just charge separate lines on the bill,

  I agree – that’s what’s happening and what the article is complaining about.

  source

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    California announces that the policy is going to expire. People who paid more and had an expectation of never-ending special road access are angry.

    This is the step where your comparison to solar (at least in California) breaks down. I’m not a California resident, but from what I understand under the NEM 1 and NEM 2 rules there is NO expectation the preferential net metering will last forever. Solar customers were specifically told that putting in solar during NEM 1 would guarantee those terms for 20 years from install date. Same thing for NEM 2, the rules would apply for 20 years from the install date. After the 20 year period, you’d be subject to whatever net meter would be offered to new customers, which could be none. source

    What this proposition proposes is cutting that 20 years to 10 years from install date:

    "Convert NEM 1.0 and 2.0 accounts to the NBT either upon sale of a home or after 10 years of interconnection. " source

    So customers that took a large financial risk installing solar that are coming out ahead may now have the deal shifted out of their favor. How is that fair to the solar customers? Worse, the knock on effect will destroy the trust in state government incentives in the future. Why would any citizen risk a long term outlay based on policy if the state government may decide one day they don’t want to hold up their end of the deal anymore?

    source
  • Wrench@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That’s a pretty weird rant on EVs.

    The carpool lanes were very under utilized. Hybrids and later EVs were also slow to be adopted, and the state wanted this adoption accelerated due to air quality and just general environmental consciousness.

    So the state decided to add the carpool benefit, which solved two problems.

    Now that EVs are far more abundant, that policy is getting revisited. Which is fair, because the carpool lane can only support so many before it just gets clogged like the main road. And people don’t necessarily need the encouragement to get EVs anymore.

    Nothing is permanent.

    source
  • matilija@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If the carpool stickers had come with a 20 year guarantee then nobody could upset about the rules changing later. This would be like solar, except that they want to change the rules later anyway.

    If they simply left the original EV carpool stickers grandfathered but stopped giving out new ones, people who missed their chance would be upset. But the program would have worked exactly as intended, to incentivize early addition of EVs by giving out a priceless benefit. It should never have gone on as long as it did, but government reacts slowly.

    source
• InvertedParallax@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  They do that now.

  For pge the distribution fees are 5x the actual generation fees, because while you can get power from other companies, pge owns all the lines and milks them dry.

  source