Comment on MBFC Credibility - High
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months agoI don’t think it works that way, it can be at different places on the scale. The other OP headlines are worse than the NYT one because they directly imply the “pre-emptive” claim is true, as opposed to indirectly implying it by choosing to reference the perspective of the IDF.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It does.
That’s irrelevant. Things don’t magically go from bad to good just because a worse version of the same thing exists.
Only difference is how sneaky they are about it. The bias they’re deliberately trying to spread is the same.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Quality of journalism isn’t a binary based on whether it is propagandizing for the correct side.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Yet another thing I never said or even implied. If you want anyone to take you seriously, it would behoove you to put away the strawmen.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 months ago
… But they said that. They were reiterating their point.