Comment

chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I don’t think it works that way, it can be at different places on the scale. The other OP headlines are worse than the NYT one because they directly imply the “pre-emptive” claim is true, as opposed to indirectly implying it by choosing to reference the perspective of the IDF.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I don’t think it works that way

It does.

The other OP headlines are worse

That’s irrelevant. Things don’t magically go from bad to good just because a worse version of the same thing exists.

they directly imply the “pre-emptive” claim is true, as opposed to indirectly implying it by choosing to reference the perspective of the IDF.

Only difference is how sneaky they are about it. The bias they’re deliberately trying to spread is the same.

source
- chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Quality of journalism isn’t a binary based on whether it is propagandizing for the correct side.
  
  source
  - Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Yet another thing I never said or even implied. If you want anyone to take you seriously, it would behoove you to put away the strawmen.
    
    source
    Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    … But they said that. They were reiterating their point.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments