The problem isn’t them quoting it. The problem is passing along the blatant misinformation as truth. Why are you using their words when it’s very clearly wrong?
Comment on MBFC Credibility - High
needanke@feddit.org 2 months ago
Nyt and Guardian seem fine, (in)directly quoting the idf.
Sundial@lemm.ee 2 months ago
nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 months ago
I’m reading this thread in awe, as I can’t see what this ‘blatant misinformation’ is that everyone sees so clearly
Hezbollah planned a large rocket attack and Israel attacked them first… How is this disputed?
Sundial@lemm.ee 2 months ago
The misinformation is that Israel is claiming they were forced to attack first due to Hezbollahs aggression. When in fact Israel is directly responsible for escalating this conflict for several months now, and Hezbollah has been showing a lot of restraint.
nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Are you denying Hezbollah was planning, and executed, a large rocket strike?
Are you saying that Hezbollah attacking Israel as a show of support back in October is ‘showing a lot of restraint’ and ‘not escalating’?
oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org 2 months ago
Hezbollah is the one who started firing missiles into Israel because of the war in Gaza. They could you know just not attack Israel. Then nothing would happen.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Israel attacks Lebanon is the correct headline.
Anything else is propaganda.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
It’s “strange” how imperial propaganda is always quoting the IDF but never the resistance.
Furball@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I see a lot of articles quote the Gaza health ministry about casualty statistics
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 months ago
He said the resistance not the doctors.
Furball@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
The Gaza health ministry is run by the government of Gaza