Comment on Lemmy.World's !News sides with Mark Zuckerberg in Censoring Palestinians
PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 months agoThe Cradle is trash though. And a defender of the Russian genocide of Ukraine.
Comment on Lemmy.World's !News sides with Mark Zuckerberg in Censoring Palestinians
PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 months agoThe Cradle is trash though. And a defender of the Russian genocide of Ukraine.
Five@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
I support Ukrainians against colonization by Russia, but I’m not threatened by journalists who cover the facts from a different perspective from mine.
Can you demonstrate your claim? I did a perfunctory search, and the stories I found involving Russia seem informative and fact-based.
PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Running interference for the Ukrainian genocide is a bit more than ‘a different perspective’. Like media that claims Israel is still defending itself in Gaza.
thecradle.co/articles-id/23408
It goes on and on like that. I can dig up more if you like.
ganksy@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Yikes! This is the first time I’ve come across The Cradle. It’s the last time too.
Five@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
I agree, Pepe Escobar’s take in that opinion piece is complete garbage. It should be noted that it is and opinion piece with the sub text “The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle.”
Shutting down the entire journal because one columnist is a Putin apologist isn’t what the concept of a free press is about. I’d be less alarmed by mods shutting down a post of that columnist for genocide apology. It looks like it’s only one featured columnist out of five occasionally posting garbage like that, and the bulk of their focus is on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Alan Dershowitz, famous for his shit takes, has apologized for torture and genocide and continues to be frequently featured in The Boston Globe, Haaretz, and The Wall Street Journal. Since those sources are posted freely, it would be inconsistent to ban The Cradle over Pepe Escobar.
PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 months ago
How many articles by how many authors since the beginning of the war need to be posted before you would regard the site as knowingly pushing Russian propaganda?
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
Here’s one: thecradle.co/…/syrian-president-assures-russia-of…
I dunno, seems pretty biased to me. Even if it’s mostly quoting politicians, uncritically repeating their propaganda without any caveats is questionable at best.
Five@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
Yeah, that’s not great, but it’s not outside the bounds of what you’d typically find in the uncritical reporting of Western politicians in periodicals like Reuters.
The issue isn’t that The Cradle is biased, all journalism is biased. The issue is that they’re being treated with the tools that should only be used for conspiracy mills and AI fake news farms. I find that alarming.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
I’m not sure I agree. For comparison, here’s a recent article on Gaza from Reuters: reuters.com/…/blinken-warns-israel-hamas-best-las…
Yes, it’s written from a western perspective, but there’s a clear attempt to include opposing perspectives including Hamas and ordinary Gazans. You see no such attempts from the Cradle’s reporting.
It’s true that all media is biased but that does not mean it’s equally biased. There is a big difference between the unavoidable bias of your own unconscious views on a topic and actively spreading misinformation. I am not very familiar with the cradle beyond these few articles but they appear to fit the latter category while Reuters and similar publications fit into the former.
Overall I think the assessment by the bias ranking seems fair, and the post removal even encouraged you to post another source on the same topic, so it’s not saying that this issue cannot be discussed. While I don’t necessarily agree with the mod’s action, it doesn’t seem like it’s an attempt to silence Palestinian voices either.