Even-dimensioned cubes (4x4x4, 6x6x6, …) are harder because they introduce some parity errors. Odd-dimensioned keep their fever center piece in the right spot.
Otherwise the size just makes it more tedious. I keep up with a 4x4x4. I had a gigaminx dodecahedron that I solved a few times, but it just made my hands tired from the weight and kept popping out pieces because of their tinyness.
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Yes, exactly. The same algorithms used to solve a 6x6 can be used to solve an 7x7, or a 10x10, or a 49x49. You just need to repeat them for each layer.
Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Makes sense. I’ve only ever worked with an original cube
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
New patterns emerge in a 4x4 compared to a 3x3, and some more new ones show up at 5x5, but after that it’s all the same thing just more layers.
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I’d argue that 6x6 centers intoduce some intricacies you don’t see on a 5x5, but beyond that, it’s pretty much just more of the same.
As an aside, are you subscribed to !cubers@lemmy.world? I’d really like to grow that community.