The requirements of deep sea submersibles and spacecraft are quite similar.
Comment on Infamous $30 Logitech F710 called out in $50M lawsuit over Titan sub implosion
deranger@sh.itjust.works 3 months agoUsing commercial off the shelf technology without proper testing and certification is absolutely cutting corners. See Kaprun disaster.
billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 months ago
pixely@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Exactly this. When you procure custom hardware, you’re paying (a lot) for the vendor to ensure that each unit meets the specifications you provide. If you validate off the shelf hardware like this, there is no guarantee that another batch of the same sku will also meet your requirements. Imagine training on these controllers then a certain batch of them has wildly different sensitivity.
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
I just read the wikipedia article; thanks for mentioning it.
I’m not sure it’s a good example of your point, though. Notably:
The fan heater is the only off-the-shelf technology listed here, and there’s no suggestion that it was part of the train’s design. It seems likely that a train conductor brought it on board to keep the compartment warm through the workday. Still a bad idea, but not an example of the designers cutting corners.
deranger@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
It’s an example of uncertified consumer grade COTS equipment used in a commercial environment to disastrous results, outside of its original designed purpose.
It was not brought on board by the conductor or someone else, it was permanently installed in place of commercial grade heaters they couldn’t source.
Scrollone@feddit.it 3 months ago
Wow. That’s creepy in a fascinating way. Cutting corners cost lives, and this is a perfect example.
llii@discuss.tchncs.de 3 months ago
It was not a train conductor that brought it with him, it was build into the train by the train manufacturer. See this page: 155.at/der-heizluefter/
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
What makes you think the train manufacturer did it? Is that on record someplace? Because the installation and materials don’t look at all like the surrounding work. Looks more like a handyman hack job.
a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
It was not the train manufacturer, but a body shop (Swoboda Karosserie- und Stahlbau GesmbH, now Carvatech), which was recruited by the Gletscherbahn Kaprun (GBK) for renovations. It might have not had so large repercussions if anyone of the actors during those renovations had done his job correctly tho:
On top of all that, because the cable cars were made of aluminium, they were deemed inflammable. This did not take into account that any installed equipment or passengers and their luggage might NOT be fireproof.
This lead to: no fire exits, no emergency signage, no training for employees how to react in case of fire.
it was a single malfunctioning heater, but the Kaprun disaster had many fathers.
I found a nice paper regarding the different actors written by a student of the University of Virginia here, well sourced.
llii@discuss.tchncs.de 3 months ago
I need to cite the German Wikipedia article, which I’ve read. It’s a good read and very long.