Comment on Follow up on supporting Immich announcement - change of wording
Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
I consider open source software to be community owned/maintained so I never liked the idea of selling the software. It makes much more sense to my eyes to sell services surrounding the software be it support, customizations, or even hosted services.
I can’t really get over selling a “license” for a software that is expected to still be maintained by unpaid contributors. Especially under an AGPL license where any licensing changes has to be approved by every contributors.
geography082@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Yeah this getting into a fake toss shit . All starts with FUTO crap and some previous shady movements they did . This will die eventually
AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 3 months ago
How is it “fake Foss” when you can just download and run the code without paywalled features and not spending anything.
twei@discuss.tchncs.de 3 months ago
I could understand the argument if Immich relicensed to the FUTO Temporary License, which technically isn’t open source, but since immich is still AGPL this makes absolutely no sense