My Linux servers weren’t affected either. I think it’s because of Windows 3.1
Comment on Windows 3.1 saves the day during CrowdStrike outage — Southwest Airlines scrapes by with archaic OS
qisope@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Or, for your consideration, could it perhaps be because they don’t use crowdstrike?
xantoxis@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
My wife shared this with me yesterday, but I didn’t see it:
Somebunny is gonna learn those things aren’t windows-based today!
Peffse@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Just yesterday I had that exact “Tech enthusiast vs tech worker” meme play out. I wanted a timer to control the electrical outlet for an aquarium bubbler. Saleswoman really wanted to sell me this “smart” controller with an app that can program the outlet.
Me:“What happens when the app stops working?”
(saleswoman is frantically flipping the box over for answers)
Her:“…maybe…it keeps the existing timer?”
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’ve got about six smart plugs that all stopped working because of lack of support. I am no longer interested in smart plugs.
Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
For only way more time and money, you can buy a zigbee smart plug and a vendor agnostic zigbee hub flashed with FOSS, or you can buy a esp-based board, wire it up with a relay, and flash it with something like esphome.
Sure, it’s way more money and hours of work (cumulatively), but it won’t lose support!
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 month ago
My old thermostat was basically two teaspoons of mercury that would expand and contract with the temperature to short out two leads. They didn’t let me keep it when I got a new one, but I got the dumbest one they had.
btaf45@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I got a new HVAC and smart thermostat about a week ago. After researching, I decided to hook thermostat to wifi and download app. Mostly all the app does is duplicate the same functionality that the thermostat controls have. I find it handy to have a remote control for the thermostat.
OTOH I decided not to hook up a new washing machine to wifi and use app. It duplicated the functionality of the appliance controls also, but there was no point in having remove controls for a washing machine.
The critical thing is that an appliance needs to be fully functional without needing to use wifi and certainly not a phone app.
noisefree@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I feel like every article out there is missing this and keeps blaming Windows Update vs an update pushed to a specific piece of software by a third-party developer. I get end-users not understanding how things work but tech writers should be more knowledgeable about the subject they write about for a living.
BlackAura@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah what a badly written article, with awful takeaways.
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Yeah, what? 3.1 not getting updates has nothing to do with this. Software developed for 3.1 can still be updated. This article is just silly.
SSJMarx@lemm.ee 1 month ago
The interesting thing here is wondering why they never upgraded. Perhaps managing flights digitally just hasn’t changed much since the early nineties and they never needed anything else?
irinotecan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Likely the same reason why banks and other financial institutions still use COBOL and Fortran code written in the 1970s or earlier on archaic mainframes: Top management decided at some point it was too expensive to rewrite everything from scratch in some modern language for modern hardware, so they just limp along with what they have.
A 16-bit app written for Windows 3.x would almost certainly have to be rewritten for modern, 64-bit Windows.
frunch@lemmy.world 1 month ago
While i figured the cost would be a factor, i just figured they were sticking with a system that works. If it serves their needs effectively and reliably, why change it?
InFerNo@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
It isn’t even a Windows update, but a software update.