I don’t see where his claim is supported in the article. That’s why I don’t reply to him as it’s a waste of time.
I’m not sure why the hostility? I’ve read the source, and you either didn’t read it or misunderstood it. Nowhere does it say what you’re claiming it says, you’re welcome to disprove that with quotes.
For anybody else reading this, if you doubt that the above commenter misunderstood the article, you can just read it. It’s not very long.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 month ago
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 1 month ago
That or you know you’re wrong and don’t want to continue being reminded.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 1 month ago
I’m not sure why you think I’m being hostile? I’m simply arguing against the core of the issue, rather than the specific suicide statistic of the article and have stated as much. I just refuse to look through your own source for you.
If you think that’s hostile than maybe you should analyze your emotional reaction to text comments on the internet?