Comment on OpenAI’s latest model will block the ‘ignore all previous instructions’ loophole

• BakerBagel@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  For what? I have zero use for any AI products

  source

  • AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It’s really useful for programming. It’s not always right but it has good approaches and you can ask it to write tedious parts of your code like long switch statements. Most of my programming problems were solved because I just explained the problem like Rubber Duck Debugging.

    source

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Depends on what you mean by “programming”.

      If you mean it like the neighboring comment, who is probably a mathematician or physicist who just needs to feed it a science paper and run some models to verify the premise, but doesn’t care about the code itself, it’s a good tool. They aren’t programmers and learning programming or using a programmer would only delay them.

      If you’re a professional programmer however your whole point is to create the most efficient specifications for the computer to do things. You cannot convey 100% of the spec to something like GPT so inevitably some is lost, so the end result is not the most efficient (or doesn’t even cover everything you needed).

      You can of course use it to get a head start but there are also boilerplate and templating tools and frameworks that cover the same purpose.

      Unlike the physicist, the code you make is the whole point, and it’s based in your knowledge of the subject matter, and you can’t replace it with GPT. Also, using GPT in this manner stunts your professional growth and damages you long term.

      It would be somewhat worth it if at least it accelerated some part of your work, and it can find its way into the tooling, but straight out replacing your brain with it ain’t it.

      For writing actual code and designing software it’s more trouble than it’s worth, it produces half-assed code that needs fixing.

      TLDR figure out ASAP if you really mean to be a programmer or some other type of specialist that only deals with programming incidentally.

      source

      • Womble@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        That level of condescension (rethink your life because you are making use of a tool I dont like) really isnt productive. You seem to be thinking that using AI as a tool to help you program is equivalent to turning your brain off and just copy and pasting code snippets, it isnt. It can be a good way to explore a language or framework you aren’t familiar with (when combined with the documentation) or to figure out general potential methods of solving a problem.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Mkengine@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    My two use cases are project brainstorming and boilerplate code, which saves a lot of time for me.

    source
  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I use it for programming questions.

    • immediate replies so I don’t have to switch tasks while praying for an answer

    • no suggestions that I just do the whole thing differently

    • infinite patience

    source

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Don’t forget the other benefits of using AI for programming:

      • It may make up shit that doesn’t exist or just give you wrong syntax

      • It will give you the same wrong answer repeatedly until you get irritated and it hangs up on you

      • Is way too goddamned excited while giving you shit answers until you run out of patience

      I like using it for help, but goddamn do I want to throw my laptop out the window some days.

      source

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        💯. Although sometimes I feel like berating the AI is more satisfying; it’s all his fault I haven’t solved this yet!

        source