Methane is a worse greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, so itâs better to burn it. Itâs also better to burn the methane that is going to be released from sewage anyway and leave fossil fuel gas trapped in the Earthâs crust.
Comment on The Power of đ©
zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev âš6â© âšmonthsâ© ago
Isnât that still a carbon-based energy source? Arenât we trying to move away from those?
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works âš6â© âšmonthsâ© ago
Blair@slrpnk.net âš6â© âšmonthsâ© ago
The main difference is that it would be moving from non-renewable sources to renewables. As well as that, the methane is already there being released, itâs just right now we donât use it and instead a large portion of the world just dumps it into the ocean or rivers untreated. So it would be turning human waste pollution into fuel and fertilizer instead of contaminating water sources and releasing the methane.
In cold climates, heat pumps donât work when itâs gets to -40c, so people who own them have gas furnaces as a backup. The same happens with electric vehicles; their range drops with the temperature, and some stopped working a few days last winter.
SO thatâs why human waste is considered a âtransition fuel.â Itâs an option to supplement other energy sources until we have what we need to transition away for good.