Comment on Google and Microsoft consume more power than some countries

1984@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You also use Gmail and force Google to run their servers to power it.

  Reducing your carbon footprint as much as possible is important, but it’s absurd to get mad at companies that power 90% of the world’s businesses for using a bunch of power to do so. It takes power to do those things.

  source

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    it’s absurd to get mad at companies that power 90% of the world’s businesses

    It’s absurd to actually think that this is what’s happening. wow.

    cnbc.com/…/googles-carbon-emissions-surge-nearly-…

    source

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Microsoft posted a revenue of $211.9 billion for 2023. Keeping in mind that the vast majority of the world’s population uses Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office and loads of online applications run on Microsoft Azure, the economic impact of Microsoft’s products is probably counted in trillions of dollars.

      Comparing this to countries with the same ballpark energy consumption, Azerbaijan’s GDP was about $78 billion, Slovakia’s GDP was around $127 billion, and Iceland’s GDP was approximately $30 billion in 2023.

      The economic output of Google and Microsoft by far exceeds these countries’ GDPs, highlighting the vast financial scale of these tech giants relative to their substantial electricity consumption.

      Oh yeah, it’s crazy to think that! I don’t know where I would have gotten that idea, other than the article that OP linked that we’re all discussing.

      Yes, training new AI models uses a bunch of power, so does building out any new infrastructure. Atleast Microsoft and Google use a far high percentage of renewable power than most other industries.

      source
• humorlessrepost@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Evens it out

  Flattens out the blowjob

  source