Comment on Microsoft is reportedly banning Palestinians in the U.S. for life for calling relatives in Gaza
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 4 months ago
REGULATE MONOPOLIES
Comment on Microsoft is reportedly banning Palestinians in the U.S. for life for calling relatives in Gaza
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 4 months ago
REGULATE MONOPOLIES
bamboo@lemm.ee 4 months ago
While I agree enthusiastically, does Skype even have a dominant market position, let alone a monopoly?
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 4 months ago
I’m talking Microsoft. Having this much control over means of communication is alarming. And Microsoft continues to grow.
Hypothetically, I wonder if they can just block Microsoft accounts alltogether, denying access to (now, kind of mandatory MS account) Windows machines.
dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
Why does it matter? If they ban your Microsoft account because you had an upside down Xbox sticker on your fridge, is it relevant if Microsoft has a monopoly on sticker manufacturing?
Skype doesn’t matter because they don’t ban you from Skype, they ban you from everything, including things they do have a dominant market position on. And also from Skype, which doesn’t matter as much.
bamboo@lemm.ee 4 months ago
When I posted that comment I was thinking specifically about Skype, not MS as a whole. I agree MS is well more than large enough that it needs regulation.
oo1@lemmings.world 4 months ago
It’s the “bundling” angle again, very hard to prove the dominant position. But them linking it all to the one account is an important feature that ties the bundle together.
uis@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Ok, oligopoly. Happy?