Comment on AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law

• afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  What’s the ignorance?

  The person was calling for a ban on advancing this technology

  Also, did you say burning up the planet even faster, stealing and profiting off of people’s livelihood, and…fucking making nonconsensual porn of underage girls are “zero” problems? The fuck?

  Let’s conduct an intelligence test, one I am sure a LLM could pass. What did I actually say? Let me know if you need help.

  source

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I always know when someone doesn’t have a good argument when they give me a dozen bad ones. 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 … Still equals 0. No matter how many times you do it.

    This. This is what you actually said. Directly after quoting exactly what I said. There’s…no other way to read that. You’re calling them non-problems that pale in comparison to the unabated advancement of capitalist expansion.

    These tools, in the right hands, could be very useful. They could free us from work in the future.

    But they’re not in the right hands. They’re in the hands of capitalists.

    Whether those are Russian capitalists, US-based capitalists, Chinese capitalists, the aim is the same. Having these people own this tech isn’t good for humanity. As evidenced by the problems I listed: not only underage, nonconsensual porn made of real-ass people that you wrote off by saying some shit like, “it’s at best in poor taste and at worst harassment.” Like, these are people’s fucking lives you’re talking about. So, you’re clearly a man, probably a white man. Because no one else would be so flippant about something that can so fucking devastate the lives of those affected.

    But not only is that a problem we aren’t even trying to solve in the name of being “pro-business,” the biggest problem that somehow even manages to rank above kids killing themselves after their still-forming brains are fucking shattered by devastation, is what this does to the ongoing class war. Someone else ITT likened it to the invention of the nuke. And that’s true. But they said, in the geopolitical race it’s akin to the invention of the nuke, whereas I see it as nuke in the class war. And the ownership class is getting closer to holding it in their hands. But since it’s good for the economy and the politicians are on the side of the ownership class anyway, this problem isn’t even broached in this discussion. But it badly needs to be.

    In a time of near unprecedented inequality, we are watching them hit the accelerator. Which is an apt comparison, because this tech is also hastening our head-on collision with climate apocalypse. While developing nations are being told to curb emissions, we in the superpower states are increasing our co2 output with this stupid tech. And you said some shit about nuclear and renewables and fuckin carbon taxes? Well, sure, those are hypothetical bandaids on this festering wound, but they’re just that. The acceleration of LLM/“AI” energy consumption while we break heat and natural disaster record after heat and natural disaster record—as that fucking climate apocalypse cliff edge approaches faster and faster is just…utter lunacy. And this alone should give us reason enough to change course. But that’s not the only reason.

    So, yeah, I vehemently disagree with your characterization of these problems as “0+0+0” when it comes to the argument against AI.

    source

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Tl:dr

      source

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “You’re gonna make an argument against my stupid position?! But I don’t wanna read five paragraphs!”

        The mark of a truly confident, well-intentioned debater.

        source

        • -> View More Comments