Comment on Even Apple finally admits that 8GB RAM isn't enough

• dojan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Companies primarily make decisions to maximise the profitability of someone and it’s never the consumer.

  source
• echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  It’s a bit first but if their primary motivation was performance improvements they wouldn’t be soldering 16 GB.

  If you’re going to weld shoes to your feet, you better at keast make sure that they’re good shoes.

  source

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Why not? There is a performance benefit to being closer to the CPU, and soldering gets you a lot closer to the CPU. That’s a fact.

    source

    • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Yeah but if you’re only putting 6 GB of RAM on then you’re also going to be constantly querying the hard drive. So any performance game you get from soldering is lost by going all the way to the hard drive every 3 microseconds.

      It’s only better performance on paper in reality there’s no real benefit. If you can run an application entirely entirely within the 6 GB of RAM, and assuming you’re not running anything else, then maybe you get better performance.

      source

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        And that’s the idea. Soldering memory is an engineering decision. How much to solder is a marketing decision. Since users can’t easily add more, marketing can upsell on more RAM.

        It’s not “on paper,” the RAM itself is performing better vs socketed RAM. Whether the system runs better depends on the configuration, as in, did you order enough RAM.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Zink@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Sounds like one of those rare cases where engineering and marketing might agree on something.

  source