Comment

Comment on Adobe Says It Won’t Train AI Using Artists’ Work. Creatives Aren’t Convinced

deweydecibel@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I know some don’t it, but I just can’t hear the word “creatives” as anything other than silicon valley speak for the source of the content they sell. It feels dehumanizing.

Particularly in this case, it’s Adobe, so you can just call them artists, designers, photographers, etc.

Or, ya know, just users.

source

Sort:hotnew top

CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
In fairness, it’s Wired who called them creatives, while Adobe called them artists.

source
- TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  That’s pretty bad. It’s like calling people “the talent”.
  
  source
  - SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Or calling all kind of art “content”.
    
    source
Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Remember when consumers where customers?

source
Eggyhead@kbin.run ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
So if artists are “creatives”, what does that make them? “Exploiters”?

source