Comment on Students’ Leaf Blower Suppressor To Hit Retail
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 month agoEvery blame where they omit the actual data to support the claim is never fully true. Provide the CFM testing data they must have to even make that claim.
There is no valid reason to omit that data unless to mislead.
KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Unfortunately I don’t agree.
Good reasons to omit details include brevity, legibility, pedagogy and scope. Showing the support for all steps in an evidence chain is simply not feasible, and we commonly have to accept that a certain presupposed level of knowledge as well as ambiguity is necessary. And much of the challenge is to be precise enough in the things that need precision.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They provided the DB data, they could have easily spent a single sentence providing the CFM data. So no, not a single one of those reasons is valid to omit 6 words.
KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Yeah, I’m sure you’re right