Comment on Students’ Leaf Blower Suppressor To Hit Retail
KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 1 month agoYou’re right to be sceptical until more data is presented, but saying no claim of progress is ever true is quite obviously a gross misrepresentation of our current reality. You are doing this on digital devices interconnected with millions of users ar staggering speed and latency. Every part of which are scientific claims.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Every blame where they omit the actual data to support the claim is never fully true. Provide the CFM testing data they must have to even make that claim.
There is no valid reason to omit that data unless to mislead.
KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Unfortunately I don’t agree.
Good reasons to omit details include brevity, legibility, pedagogy and scope. Showing the support for all steps in an evidence chain is simply not feasible, and we commonly have to accept that a certain presupposed level of knowledge as well as ambiguity is necessary. And much of the challenge is to be precise enough in the things that need precision.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They provided the DB data, they could have easily spent a single sentence providing the CFM data. So no, not a single one of those reasons is valid to omit 6 words.
KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Yeah, I’m sure you’re right