That’s weirdest part, at this point the hoops Amazon has jumped through vs how profitable of a company they are - it must be cheaper for them to just let people unionise and pay them more + give better conditions?
That’s weirdest part, at this point the hoops Amazon has jumped through vs how profitable of a company they are - it must be cheaper for them to just let people unionise and pay them more + give better conditions?
SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 1 year ago
Do you want to pay people more because they’re better at their job or do you want to pay people more because they’ve been warming a chair longer than anyone else?
Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 year ago
I really don’t care to play “who deserves a minimum quality of life”.
SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 1 year ago
Reality doesn’t care whether you care to play or not.
There’s a limited amount of resources, you can’t hire everyone on Earth, you can’t give everyone an unlimited salary. Everything past that you’re making decisions as to who gets what.
And by the way, if you make enough poor decisions eventually everyone loses their jobs.
SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There are PLENTY of resources to go around, but a teeny teeny tiny percentage of people are hogging over half of them all for themselves.
Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Agreed, there’s limited resources, that’s exactly why we can’t afford to waste any more on another CEO mega yacht or private plane.
Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 year ago
Life’s not a video game or a book.
dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Or because people need more to make a living? The whole argument of “it’s a shitty job and shouldn’t be used to support you” doesn’t really work anymore.
SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 1 year ago
That doesn’t have anything to do with what I said.