It literally isn’t. Douche bag
Comment on Joost Klein: Dutch contestant disqualified from Eurovision Song Contest
kokesh@lemmy.world 4 months ago
This community is named INTERESTING intentional news…
Radium@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 months ago
Radium@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
Yes, because I can tell the difference between a canonical community name and a vanity name. If you look at the url for the community, what does it say?
That name can’t be changed while the “interesting global news” vanity name can.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 months ago
Think about this: Someone using a client like mine that does not show the URL and only the display name would not necessarily know the distinction.
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 4 months ago
“Interesting” is a perspective. Something that one might find interesting, another finds absolutely boring. As a post author, I do find it interesting, since it’s extremely rare that someone gets disqualified from the event. Especially since they refused to do that of Israel who are being investigated by ICC for genocide, yet they booted Netherlands for mere probability of the police investigation.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 4 months ago
Unless I missed something major here, I don’t think the Israeli contestant was personally involved in genocide, and certainly as not involved in genocide on the set of the show, whereas the Dutch contestant was allegedly involved in backstage on-set misconduct, so that seems completely reasonable?
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 4 months ago
It has no bearing that the contestant personally didn’t do anything. They banned Russia from participating for the actions of a state.
And allegation is not proof anything happened, it’s just an unsupported accusation. Any person can accuse someone else of something, that doesn’t mean it’s true.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 4 months ago
Sure, and drawing comparisons between those two events is completely fair, but I don’t really see where the parallels lie between that event and what is happening to Klein.